UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

pigskin Cen Michigan
  
Cen Michigan          
W-L: ( 7- 5) PR = 73.6553

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 829 A San Jose St MIDW ( 3- 9, 70.0) 16-14 906 A Pittsburgh ACC ( 8- 4, 84.9) 17-45 913 A Michigan B10 ( 9- 3, 86.2) 3-63 920 H Wagner 49-10 927 H Ea Michigan MIDA ( 4- 8, 68.0) 24-13 1004 A Akron MIDA ( 5- 7, 64.0) 22-28 1018 A Bowl. Green MIDA ( 4- 8, 65.5) 27- 6 1025 H UMass IND ( 0-12, 52.8) 38-13 1101 A We Michigan MIDA ( 9- 4, 75.9) 21-24 1112 H Buffalo MIDA ( 5- 7, 65.9) 38-19 1119 A Kent State MIDA ( 5- 7, 65.5) 28-16 1129 H Toledo MIDA ( 8- 4, 79.2) 3-21

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   829 A San Jose St            16-14       2     1           1.07
   906 A Pittsburgh             17-45     -28   -14          -0.12
   913 A Michigan                3-63     -60   -15           0.00
   927 H Ea Michigan            24-13      11     8    +      2.66
  1004 A Akron                  22-28      -6     7    ---  -13.00
  1018 A Bowl. Green            27- 6      21     5    +++    8.52
  1025 H UMass                  38-13      25    24           0.00
  1101 A We Michigan            21-24      -3    -5           1.93
  1112 H Buffalo                38-19      19    10    +      3.54
  1119 A Kent State             28-16      12     5    +++    6.50
  1129 H Toledo                  3-21     -18    -3    ---  -11.11

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1004 A Akron                  22-28      -6     7    ---  -13.00
  1129 H Toledo                  3-21     -18    -3    ---  -11.11

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1018 A Bowl. Green            27- 6      21     5    +++    8.52
  1119 A Kent State             28-16      12     5    +++    6.50
   927 H Ea Michigan            24-13      11     8    +      2.66
  1112 H Buffalo                38-19      19    10    +      3.54

Cen Michigan Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col ` Cen Michigan tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Cen Michigan
California California   California
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St Florida St tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Florida St
Georgia Tech Georgia Tech tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Georgia Tech
Louisville Louisville insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Louisville
Miami Miami insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Miami
UNC UNC   UNC
NC St NC St tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) NC St
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pittsburgh  
SMU SMU   SMU
Stanford Stanford tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Stanford
Syracuse Cen Michigan tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Cen Michigan
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
Va Tech Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Wake Forest Wake Forest   Wake Forest
Army Army   Army
Charlotte Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Ea Carolina Ea Carolina   Ea Carolina
Fla Atlantic Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Memphis Memphis   Memphis
Navy Navy   Navy
No Texas No Texas insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) No Texas
Rice Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
So Florida So Florida   So Florida
Temple Cen Michigan tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cen Michigan
Tulane Tulane   Tulane
Tulsa Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
UAB Cen Michigan insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Cen Michigan
UTSA UTSA   UTSA
Arizona Arizona   Arizona
Arizona St Arizona St   Arizona St
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Baylor   Baylor
Cincinnati Cincinnati tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cincinnati
Colorado Colorado   Colorado
Houston Houston   Houston
Iowa St Iowa St   Iowa St
Kansas Kansas   Kansas
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
TCU TCU   TCU
Texas Tech Texas Tech tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Texas Tech
UCF Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Utah Utah   Utah
We Virginia We Virginia insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) We Virginia
Illinois Illinois insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Illinois
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Iowa
Maryland Maryland tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Maryland
Michigan Michigan Michigan  
Michigan St Michigan St insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Michigan St
Minnesota Minnesota tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Minnesota
Nebraska Nebraska insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Nebraska
Northwestern Northwestern tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Northwestern
Ohio St Ohio St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Ohio St
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Purdue Purdue tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Purdue
Rutgers Rutgers   Rutgers
UCLA UCLA   UCLA
USC USC insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) USC
Washington Washington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Washington
Wisconsin Wisconsin tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Wisconsin
Florida Intl Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Jacksonv. St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Kennesaw St Kennesaw St   Kennesaw St
Liberty Cen Michigan insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Cen Michigan
La Tech La Tech   La Tech
Middle Tenn Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
NM St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
SHouston St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
UTEP Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
We Kentucky We Kentucky tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) We Kentucky
UMass Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
Notre Dame Notre Dame insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Notre Dame
UConn UConn tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UConn
Akron Akron Akron  
Ball St Cen Michigan tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 3) Cen Michigan
Bowl. Green Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
Buffalo Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
Ea Michigan Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
Kent State Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
MiamiOH MiamiOH MiamiOH   4- 1 vs 2- 3
No Illinois Cen Michigan Cen Michigan   3- 2 vs 1- 4
Ohio Ohio tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Ohio
Toledo Toledo Toledo  
We Michigan We Michigan We Michigan  
Air Force Cen Michigan tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cen Michigan
Boise State Boise State   Boise State
Colorado St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Fresno St Fresno St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Fresno St
Hawaii Hawaii insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Hawaii
Nevada Cen Michigan tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cen Michigan
New Mexico New Mexico insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) New Mexico
San Diego St San Diego St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) San Diego St
San Jose St Cen Michigan Cen Michigan  
UNLV UNLV   UNLV
Utah St Utah St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Utah St
Wyoming Cen Michigan insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Cen Michigan
Oregon St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Wash St Wash St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Wash St
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas Arkansas   Arkansas
Auburn Auburn   Auburn
Florida Florida   Florida
Georgia Georgia   Georgia
Kentucky Kentucky insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Kentucky
LSU LSU   LSU
Missouri Missouri tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Missouri
Miss St Miss St   Miss St
Oklahoma Oklahoma insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So Carolina So Carolina   So Carolina
Tennessee Tennessee   Tennessee
Texas Texas tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Texas
Texas A&M Texas A&M   Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt   Vanderbilt
App St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Arkansas State Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Coastal Car Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Georgia So Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Georgia St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
J Madison J Madison   J Madison
Louisiana Cen Michigan insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Cen Michigan
Marshall Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Old Dominion Old Dominion   Old Dominion
So Miss Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
So Alabama Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Texas State Texas State tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Texas State
Troy Cen Michigan tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Cen Michigan
La-Monroe Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Delaware Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Missouri St Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan

PowerWise = 44


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.13

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A San Jose St     ( 3- 9, 70.0)    16-14      -29.85      17.30       2.67         1.10            44.06
   0 A Pittsburgh      ( 8- 4, 84.9)    17-45      -15.04      32.11       2.67         1.10            -6.82
   0 A Michigan        ( 9- 3, 86.2)     3-63      -13.69      33.46       2.67         1.10            -6.07
   0 H Ea Michigan     ( 4- 8, 68.0)    24-13      -31.91      15.24      -2.67         1.10            27.72
   0 A Akron           ( 5- 7, 64.0)    22-28      -35.92      11.23       2.67         1.10           -18.33
   0 A Bowl. Green     ( 4- 8, 65.5)    27- 6      -34.40      12.75       2.67         1.10            34.03
   0 H UMass           ( 0-12, 52.8)    38-13      -47.15       1.00      -2.67         1.10            -3.69
   0 A We Michigan     ( 9- 4, 75.9)    21-24      -23.99      23.16       2.67         1.10           -11.76
   0 H Buffalo         ( 5- 7, 65.9)    38-19      -34.03      13.12      -2.67         1.10            23.05
   0 A Kent State      ( 5- 7, 65.5)    28-16      -34.42      12.73       2.67         1.10            33.99
   0 H Toledo          ( 8- 4, 79.2)     3-21      -20.68      26.47      -2.67         1.10           -12.88
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       103.29

winning pts = 159.1490 losing points = -55.8611

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------